A Colombian judge recently made a ground-breaking ruling regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) language models in legal decision-making. In the case of whether an autistic child’s insurance should cover all of the costs of his medical treatment, the judge relied on the OpenAI language model, ChatGPT, to assist in writing a court ruling.
The use of AI language models in legal decision-making is a topic that has garnered significant attention in recent years, especially with the launch of ChatGPT in the past few months. ChatGPT is an AI system that is capable of generating human-like text based on input and trained on vast amounts of text data from the internet pertaining to all fields and industries.
In this particular case, the judge acknowledged the use of ChatGPT as an “auxiliary tool” but emphasised that the final decision was made by the judge based on the analysis of evidence and applicable law. The judge also stated that the use of AI models does not replace human judgment but rather assists in decision-making by providing a quick and efficient way to analyse large amounts of data.
This ruling marks a significant step forward in the integration of AI into the legal system and highlights the potential for AI models to assist in the decision-making process. However, it is important to note that the use of AI in legal decision-making should be carefully evaluated and regulated to ensure that it does not compromise the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. The Colombian judge’s ruling has sparked a larger conversation about the role of AI in the legal system and raises questions about the ethical and practical implications of relying on AI models in court rulings. While AI has the potential to bring significant benefits to the legal system, it is crucial that its use is carefully evaluated and regulated to ensure that it serves justice and protects the rights of all individuals and is not unduly influenced by bias and inaccuracy.